Aggression

General Aggression Model

© Melanie Lamprecht

This article uses the general aggression model (GAM) to address what aggression is.

It is evident that since World War II, homicide rates have in fact escalated rather than declined in some developed countries, particularly the United States. Accordingly, up to date there has been new interest in understanding why humans occasionally act aggressively and studies on human aggression have advanced to a point at which a combined structure is needed.

What is aggression?

In an influential article, Anderson & Bushman (2002) state that human aggression is any conduct aimed at another individual with the immediate goal to cause harm. It is important to also note that the person responsible for the aggression must believe that the action will injure the target, and that the target is provoked to steer clear of the action

Aggression can be divided into two category schemes namely: hostile and instrumental aggression.Hostile aggression, in the past, has been considered as being spontaneous, thoughtless motivated by anger, having the definitive motive of harming the target, and taking place as a response to some apparent aggravation. It is occasionally called affective, impulsive, or reactive aggression. On the other hand Anderson & Carnagey (2004) illustrate instrumental aggression as a deliberate means of attaining some target other than hurting the victim, and being proactive rather than reactive.

Furthermore, there are five domain specific theories of aggression. The Cognitive Neoassociation Theory suggests that negative influences produced by disagreeable occurrences routinely encourages various thoughts, expressive motor reactions, memories and physiological reactions linked with both fight and flight trends. These relations augment basic feelings of anger in the fight response or feelings of fear in the flight response. The aversive events producing negative affects could include frustrations, provocations, loud noises, uncomfortable temperatures, and unpleasant odors. Furthermore, in cognitive neoassociation aggressive feelings, emotions, and behavioral predispositions are associated mutually in memory. This theory therefore clarifies that aversive events amplify aggressive tendency via negative affect.

The Social Learning Theory proposes that people obtain aggressive reactions similar to the mode ofattaining other intricate types of social behavior for example by immediate experience orby examining others.

Anderson & Bushman (2002) describe another theory called Script Theory. Scripts are collections of primarily well-rehearsed, exceptionally related concepts in memory, often involving contributory links, aims, and action strategies. This theory proposes that when children watch violence in the mass media, they gain knowledge of aggressive scripts. Multiple practice of these scripts can generate associations to other notions in memory and amplify the strengths of these links.

The Excitation Transfer Theory however, comments that physiological arousal is dispelled gradually. The notion suggests that if two arousing actions are divided by a small amount of time, arousal from the initial event may be mistakenly permitted to the subsequent event. If the subsequent event is linked to anger, then the supplementary arousal should make the person even angrier. Consequently, even after the arousal has degenerated, the person’s initial marker of anger continues.

Lastly, Anderson & Bushman (2002) offer an explanation of the social interaction theory,which infers aggressive conduct as social influence conduct and provides a clarification of aggressive acts aggravated by advanced level goals. This theory proposes an exceptional way to comprehend current findings that aggression is often the product of coercion to high self-esteem, particularly to unprovoked high self-esteem.

Resources:

Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B. (2002). Human Aggression. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2002. 53:27–51.

Anderson, C.A. & Carnagey, N.L. (2004). Violent Evil and the General Aggression Model.Chapter in A. Miller (Ed). The Social Physiology of the Good and Evil (pp168-192)


The copyright of the article Aggression in Child Psychology is owned by Melanie Lamprecht. Permission to republish Aggression must be granted by the author in writing.




Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo